![]() ![]() There will likely be an increase in the frequency of squat jerking in coming years, particularly among the smaller weight classes, as coaches and lifters find that jerk weights cannot keep pace with increases in the clean, and find ways to better train lifters from the start of their careers to receive and recover from squat jerks more effectively. This is why it’s so rare, and also why it’s more common among Asian lifters who tend to possess shorter, stronger legs and good mobility. It is an extremely rare individual who possesses the mobility, precision and leg strength to make this jerk style successful. Mobility is an immediate limiting factor for most athletes-a relatively narrow-grip overhead squat is out of reach for lifters outside of the most mobile end of the spectrum.Īdditionally, there exists the need for even greater precision in bar placement than in the power jerk-little can be done to stabilize a bar that is even slightly out of position when you’re in the bottom of a squat (in a power jerk, you have a greater ability to step to relocate your base under a misplaced bar).įinally, consider the difficulty of recovering from the bottom of a close-grip overhead squat, often from a dead stop, particularly immediately following the effort to clean the weight. This clearly requires less elevation of the bar than the power jerk, but also introduces a few unique elements of difficulty. The squat jerk is identical in foot position to the power jerk, but as the name implies, the ultimate receiving position is a full depth squat. If you never have to get very low in your heaviest jerks, the split is unnecessary. ![]() The power jerk is a good choice for an athlete who naturally is able to drive the bar very high, has no problem putting the bar in a solid overhead position, and has consistently good balance in the drive. This is why extremely immobile lifters resort to a split snatch rather than squat snatch. less overhead mobility demand) in a low split position relative to a power receiving position of the same depth. This becomes an even greater problem because the demand on overhead mobility is increased the lower you sit toward a parallel squat-a lifter is able to maintain a more vertical trunk position (i.e. It’s far easier to support such a depth and knee angle in a split position, and to recover from it.Īdditionally, there exists little margin for error in bar position-the bar must be driven quite precisely into position overhead in order for the athlete to maintain its stability. The power receiving position is more difficult to hold than a split at lower depths because the mechanics of the knee are so poor as you near a horizontal thigh, so the receiving depth is pretty limited for most lifters (a notable exception is Apti Aukhadov, who receives close to a parallel squat). While the power jerk is a fairly common training exercise, it’s a comparatively rare competitive jerk style because of its greater demand on bar elevation relative to the split. (The name push jerk is often used synonymously for power jerk the two can be distinguished by defining a push jerk as a power jerk in which the feet remain connected to the platform rather than being lifted and replaced.) The power jerk is named such because the receiving position is identical to those of the power snatch and power clean-feet in the squat stance and thighs above horizontal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |